Indeed, if you must take sides in the pros and cons of cloning debate, your main responsibility is to enter it with an open, educated and informed mind first and stable emotions second. List of Cons of Reproductive Cloning 1. There is also an increased risk of miscarriage, which can be harmful to the surrogate mother. By cloned cells from healthy familial donors, it could be possible to put an end to some of the deadliest and disorders that the human race faces today. Reproductive cloning would diminish the sense of uniqueness of an individual.
Therapeutic cloning is a complex topic with a multitude of pros and cons. We already work on this through artificial natural selection. Human cloning was a popular theme in but technological progress has made possible the clonation of species. She is a proud veteran, wife and mother. It can revive endangered or extinct species. Otherwise, we would continue to be polarized. It would still be a unique individual, but there would also be some continuity to the emotional process that could ease grief.
With all animals have nearly the same, if not identical, genetic makeup, the species would be at an increased risk of extinction because of the risks of inbreeding. Vittana's goal is to publish high quality content on some of the biggest issues that our world faces. With therapeutic cloning, these wait times would disappear. Another layer to the moral concerns which limit therapeutic cloning is the destruction of embryos. There is no inconsistency between supporting the former and opposing the latter.
Not only could this prevent humanity from being able to adapt to changing circumstances — like the Spanish flu — it could also cause everyone to look the same. It can reduce the possibility of organs being rejected during transplants. Using genetic alteration in plants and animals, researchers can replicate organisms needed for research. For bovines that are bred through reproductive cloning, this syndrome has occurred in over half of the total cloning attempts. Would there be any defense against people collecting cells and cloning random people? Although the nucleus information is replaced to create an effective clone, the attributes of the stem cells which appear are not necessarily as valuable from an attribute standpoint as stem cells that form through the natural reproductive process.
It may help to treat genetic diseases. This would contribute to increase lifespams and quality of life in the world. This debate reflects the wide spectrum of diverse religious and secular moralities that are prevalent in modern multicultural European democratic societies. The technique of interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer, in which interspecies cloned embryos can be reconstructed by using domestic animal oocytes as nuclear recipients and endangered animal or human somatic cells as nuclear donors, can afford more opportunities in endangered animal rescue and human tissue transplantation, but the application of this technique is limited by extremely low efficiency which may be attributed to donor nucleus not fully reprogrammed by xenogenic cytoplasm. Though other countries, such as Canada, do not completely prohibit therapeutic cloning, they impose very strict rules on it. Though the possible medical benefits of cloning humans are still not fully known, it is argued that such a technology can completely transform the ways by which many disorders are being performed. In return, however, its advantages are also quite apparent.
Some scientists feared that the process of creating cells or organs from a destroyed embryo could eventually lead into human cloning. Without wolves, for example, Yellowstone National Park saw a greater erosion of their river beds. Reproductive cloning is often compared with therapeutic cloning. Even then, she grew up to become a sickly sheep and had to be euthanized because of her illnesses. There is also the likely ability to alter genetic constituents in cloned humans, and cloning could help combat genetic diseases. It might be used for exploitation. It is an innovation that can change the world in a positive way.
Some argue against putting a price tag on a part of the body that is not involved in the propagation of life. Though a human clone would undoubtedly be a brand new life with unique preferences, there would still be a potential loss of individuality because a clone is simply a twin of someone else, no matter what the age of that other person may be. This could eventually lead to better treatments, prolonged lifespans, and an overall better quality of life. In 2150, that figure could double to 20 billion people. Video: What is Human Cloning? Given that cells would just become defective and eventually die, extracting them from embryos would not provide any real benefits. It may enhance the aging process.
However, the pregnancy and calving rates from the transfer of such embryos are still well below that required for large-scale commercial application for which ongoing pregnancy rates of at least 50% per recipient will be required. Therapeutic cloning is so controversial, because it is tied to ethical issues that are connected to life and death. Some of the arguments are religious in nature. If you feel this user's conduct is unappropriate, please report this comment and our moderaters will review its content and deal with this matter as soon as possible. Somatic cells do not have the same attributes as new stem cells. But, when the time comes that the method would be perfected, reproductive cloning can be used to help infertile parents who would like to have their own children as well as parents who want to have twins. Pro: Reproductive Cloning Reproductive cloning has a number of pros.
Arguments in Favor of Reproductive Cloning 1. Organs must be harvested quickly after the donor dies and taken to a hospital for transplant within hours. However, there are still questions about the safety of these cloned tissues in humans. Even if technology were created in which your memories and thoughts could be transmitted to the clone, your clone would still be a different person. The process of therapeutic cloning could create organs that are healthy in a fraction of the time needed to wait for a donor one.