Laertes replies that he would cut Hamlet's throat in a church, and the King approves, saying. Abuse, Human, Human rights 838 Words 3 Pages Can terrorism ever be justified? After King Claudius has persuaded Laertes that Hamlet is responsible for Polonius' death and Ophelia's madness, Laertes promises that. Hamlet clearly suffers with the unavenged death of his father and the seemingly carelessness and remoreslessness of his mother and Claudius. The motivation of revenge is vengeance. Using the example from before where a burglar steals an Item, Instead of being sent to Jail, reparation would quire them to give back something of equal value, for example pay a fine, to the person who it was stolen from. Here is an example organized revenge : One day a burglar breaks into a family home and murders the mother. Revenge is justified when the person feels strongly offended and no one can help them.
Another reason is that Antonio prevents him from doing business as he loans money interest free. The verdict is guilty and the judge order for the burglar to be put to death. That would be scann'd: A villain kills my father; and for that, I, his sole son, do this same villain send To heaven. When the ghost first appears to Hamlet he tells him that it was his brother who slipped poison in his ear while he was sleeping in the orchard and clearly asks him to get revenge for his untimely murder. Thus, it has been a common theme and concept in literature. By doing that he learns that there are consequences.
This statement prompts one to believe Hamlet has been convinced by his father? Since the Heads of the three major families were each murdered, the eldest sons of these families swore vengeance, and two of the three sons died while exacting their acts of vengeance. They do not think about the past, nor do they do not think about the future. This issue has raised ethical problems, which are still problematic till today. Two great examples of this theme would be The Butcher Boy by Patrick McCabe and Hamlet, Prince of Denmark by William Shakespeare. If one commits any type of felony it would be trailed and the punishment would vary depending one the situation.
People need to wake up and realize that revenge is always hypocritical and illogical. Beatrice and her master fall in love and one night while she is on a job, she discovers she is pregnant. If a person commits a crime, they should obviously be punished as with any Justice system. People think by hurting others and taking revenge on them will make them happy and think everything will be balanced between them but it just causes more pain and brings destruction as time goes. Soliloquy later reveals Hamlet's torn sensibility and care for justice, which decelerates his ability to proceed in action against Claudius.
The medieval believer on magic and superstitions are portrayed through the depiction of Ghost. Though, it is unclear of the relationship Hamlet Jr. He acts with reason, and he does not let his emotions guide him. Shakespeare ensures that Hamlet does avenge his father in the end. Those feelings can make us act in ways that can destroy. And then Claudius will go to hell, not heaven, so the revenge will be perfect.
It was a disgrace to his brothers name and Hamlet noticed this and added it to the list of reasons why what his family is doing is wrong. Civil disobedience, Human rights, Ku Klux Klan 694 Words 2 Pages. To be, or not to be- that is the question: Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune Or to take arms against a sea of troubles, And by opposing end them. When Hamlet tries to kill his uncle, he ends up killing Polonius and getting himself killed. Catherine Earnshaw, Emily Brontë, Hareton Earnshaw 1128 Words 3 Pages Revenge Cycle Revenge has the definition of taking vengeance for injuries or wrongs; retaliation. The desires of Hamlet, Laertes, and young Fortinbras each exhibit how the plot of Hamlet, by William Shakespeare revolves entirely around revenge.
In trying to accomplish it he kills an innocent man, Polonius. It just hurts them and makes them more miserable. He took the life of a person, just like the murderer, which makes him no better, right? It is based on the principle of an eye for an eye, but this principle is not always an intelligent theory to live by. As the crimes get more serious, retribution as a form of punishment becomes very similar to revenge and this is the only time when revenge is Justified. However, revenge should be avoided as an option.
This makes Hamlet realize that he must take action now and that the revenge within him must come out because of theses men willing to sacrifice their lives over nothing and hamlet is sitting their doing nothing over his own beloved fathers death. But what really is revenge? Even though Hamlet said he would take revenge with no hesitation, that was not the outcome; he was rather slow and over-thinks every detail before acting. If the person is out for revenge then it will only lead to calamity and violence. Even though he does not immediately suspect foul play in his father's untimely death, he is in a state of shock. The only purpose of revenge is to gain satisfaction in seeing the wrongdoer suffer.
I came to realization that in some ways revenge can be justified and in some ways it really cannot. The last scene of the play, Laertes and Hamlet join in a loving duel, or so Hamlet thought. Maybe she did it to stay the queen, maybe she really did love claudius, either way her life with King Hamlet was easily forgotten while Hamlet could not do the same. It would seem that vigilante justice leads only to misery, revenge can hold no place in organized society. Revenge is an emotion easily rationalized; one turn deserves another.
Revenge is a concept introduced into the play from the very start when the Ghost appears and speaks with Hamlet. William Shakespeare's Hamlet fully satisfies each of these traits, making it an excellent example of a revenge tragedy. Moreover that we much did long to see you, The need we have to use you did provoke Our hasty sending. The Code of Hammurabi, the code of law from the sixth king of Babylon, was put into practice around 1760 B. Hamlet writes this in a letter to Ophelia right before the play begins.